Joe Biden called it "Bulls*it"
Nancy Pelosi said it was beneath his office
All over these comments.
"Some seem to believe we should negotiate with terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along," the President said to the country's legislative body, "We have heard this foolish delusion before. As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: 'Lord, if only I could have talked to Hitler, all of this might have been avoided.' We have an obligation to call this what it is –- the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history."
All of this over a perceived attack on the democratic nominee, Well if the shoe fits wear it, But what the Demoncrats don't understand is that the world doesn't revolve around Obama.
Bush was attacking appeaser's in general, But if Obama felt threatened by that, than he must have identified with Bush's characterization of an appeaser.
As the saying goes "The Dog that barks is the one that was hit with the shoe"
Bush spoke the truth, Appeasement=Death
If Obama can talk to Iran but not Foxnews what does that say about him?
He would most certainly go down the Clinton Foreign Policy path with North Korea, and where did that get us? Well it got North Korea access to nuclear technology courtesy of the Clinton Administration.
Will Obama also sell secrets to China?
If He wants to talk to the Iranian Government then how about Hamas? They are exactly the same type of people. Terrorists. His foreign policy would destroy both America and Israel.
I will let his words speak as to his loyalty to Israel (from dreams of my fathers)
"I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction."
McCain is the only person qualified to run this country and stand with Israel.
PW has spoken
UPDATE: WHITE HOUSE SAYS STATEMENT'S WERE AIMED AT CARTER, VERY UNDERSTANDABLE GIVEN CARTER'S MEETING WITH HAMAS
Thursday, May 15, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Prophecy, Bush, Israel and Myanmar
President Bush’s Knesset speech has created a furor and those who fear and resent the truth have reacted accordingly. Whether or not the speech was really directed at Obama and his ilk is for Bush to know and the world to wonder. The truth as President sees it is that negotiating with bad people is generally bad business. He provided ample history to make his point, and none of his protagonists have demonstrated where negotiating with really bad people makes much sense—at least historically. This brings me to the question of Myanmar. Here we have a regime that is among the most brutal in the world, at least in modern times. To say the least, they are bad guys. If two weeks ago, they expressed an intention to kill 150,000 of their citizens, just on general principles, the world understandably would have been outraged. But how much negotiation would have prevented them from doing it. Threats maybe, but not negotiation. For the last two weeks the International Community has been unable to negotiate even the slimmest of access to Myanmar to provide humanitarian relief. One would likely think that if you can’t negotiate with bad guys when the only thing at stake is humanitarian relief, then negotiations when our freedom and our way of life is on the table might not be a prudent thing to do.
Dude there terrorist you do not negotiate with terrorist if so they will kill you me and others.Look it up for yourself in the koran it says and I quote "kill all infedels."Just remember this phrase when you decide to go to Iraq or Afganistan and try to " negotiate with terroris. "
Post a Comment